Every once in a while, I hear a woman lament that there are no “good men” out there.
I disagree that there are no good men out there. Good men are everywhere. What constitutes a “good man”? Women generally describe a good man as someone who is affectionate, communicative, has a genuine desire to commit, and has the character to honor his commitments. They are not hard to find. In fact, women are constantly interacting with good men daily, but they are not choosing them as partners. Why?
As you know, I root my analysis of human behavior in universal truths about nature. With a willingness to see nature as it really is, and a basic understanding of the evolutionary process, one can understand why many women are left with a high-mileage box, and an assumption that all men are alike.
It is not in a woman’s nature to be attracted to what we deem as good men. The qualities I listed above are not characteristic of men who dominate other men and reproduce. You must remember that there is very little difference between our genotype, and that of the Cro-Magnon. We are 30,000 years old. Our technological inventions haven’t necessarily evolved us. Primitive man either dominated other males in his tribe and fucked as many females as he could during his lifespan, or he would be dominated and rejected by females, thus not be able to reproduce at all. Today is not much different. If you want to have a large, prosperous family, you must be powerful, not sensitive.
Women are intuitively aware of this, and that is why they continually choose to spread for the “bad boy”. Many of them are not even consciously aware of why they are attracted to the asshole who will inevitably, at best, will not commit…at worst, destroy their lives. Women interact with good men daily. Perhaps he is a coworker, or perhaps he is an underling. Perhaps he asked you out, but you lied and told him that you had a boyfriend. You rejected him because he didn’t turn you on in any way. That benign feeling is your instinct that tells you not to breed with a powerless man.
A reason why women often do not commit to a good man (that she might happen to be fucking) is that she is not necessarily built to. Humans are not ducks. We do not mate for life. In fact, we are quite promiscuous. Our societies have constructed marriage, not our genes. It is not uncommon for female primates to reproduce with several partners over a lifetime. A friend of mine once said to me, “Women are better dealers. No matter who they’re with, they will always keep an eye out for a better deal”. It is in a woman’s nature to constantly seek a more viable breeding partner. It does not make them bad people, it’s just nature.
Right now, you are citing exceptions to this rule. You know several couples (possibly even your own parents) who have spent their entire lives together and who are somewhat happy about it. There are people who have the character to make a lifetime commitment to a partner, to strive to be a better one as time goes on, and can remain monogamous. They are the exception. Their emotional intelligence and cognitive skills prevent them from yielding to their basal human wants.
Speaking of basal human wants, here’s the pussy of the day:
http://www.penis-enlargment.info/worldsex/inthecrack05/15.jpg
She has an unusually large clitoral hood and what seems like a second set of inverted inner labia. Not bad.
The Pussicurean